ChoGluek, C. “Conversations with Steven John helped me to engage more directly with his work on the “Value-Apt Ideal.” Work is still in progress. Also, I was invited by H. Bondurant to present my work (related to the morning-after pill) at the Philosophy, Politics, and Economics meeting in 2020, and we’ll be presenting there this March!”
Purcell, E.B. January 2019, “Interdependent Value” (Plenary Speaker), Environment, Peace and Morality: East and West, Institute of Cross Cultural Studies and Academic Exchange, Society for Indian Philosophy and Religion Elon, Siliguri, India.
Marion Boulicault and S. Andrew Schroeder collaborated on a forthcoming book chapter: “Public Trust in Science: Exploring the Idiosyncrasy-Free Ideal” (abstract and link below):
“What makes science trustworthy to the public? This chapter examines one proposed answer: the trustworthiness of science is based at least in part on its independence from the idiosyncratic values, interests, and ideas of individual scientists. That is, science is trustworthy to the extent that following the scientific process would result in the same conclusions, regardless of the particular scientists involved. We analyze this “idiosyncrasy-free ideal” for science by looking at philosophical debates about inductive risk, focusing on two recent proposals which offer different methods of avoiding idiosyncrasy: the high epistemic standards proposal and the democratic values proposal.” https://philpapers.org/rec/BOUPTI
Merrick, T. “I have developed a Race, Sex, and Science course in collaboration with my colleagues in the biochem department.”
Marshall, J. M. “AT UTD, I have participated in collaboration with students and faculty in the ArtSciLab, which is heavily oriented toward research.”